Effect of Parity and Calving Month on Milk Production and Quality of Greek Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

Authors

  • Vasileios A. Bampidis Alexander Technological Educational Institute (ATEITHE), Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Department of Animal Production, 57400-Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Eleonora Nistor Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Timişoara, 30064 -Timişoara, Romania
  • Vasileios B. Skapetas Alexander Technological Educational Institute (ATEITHE), Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Department of Animal Production, 57400-Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Vladimiros Christodoulou Animal Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Foundation (NAGREF), 58100-Giannitsa, Greece
  • Dimitrios Chatziplis Alexander Technological Educational Institute (ATEITHE), Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Department of Animal Production, 57400-Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Ioannis Mitsopoulos Alexander Technological Educational Institute (ATEITHE), Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Department of Animal Production, 57400-Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Vasiliki Lagka Alexander Technological Educational Institute (ATEITHE), Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Department of Animal Production, 57400-Thessaloniki, Greece

Keywords:

Greek buffalo, Milk composition, Milk yield

Abstract

Forty lactating Greek buffalo cows were used in an experiment to determine effects of parity and calf birth month on productivity and milk composition. Buffalo cows gave birth on months June and August 2009, and were kept under semi closed system of management. From June to November, during the day the buffalo cows were allowed to graze on the surroundings from 10:00 h and flocked back at 16:00 h. In the experiment, which started on week 6 postpartum and lasted 24 weeks, buffalo cows were fed alfalfa hay, corn silage, wheat straw and concentrate, and were allocated, relative to parity, into treatments GBP1 (21 buffalo cows with parity 1, 2, and 3) and GBP2 (19 buffalo cows with parity 4, 5, and 6), and, relative to calf birth month, into treatments GBB1 (20 buffalo cows with June as calf birth month) and GBB2 (20 buffalo cows with August as calf birth month). Productivity and milk composition were not affected (P>0.05) by calf birth month. During the experiment, there were differences (P<0.001) between GBP1 and GBP2 treatments in average milk yield (4.1 vs. 5.3 kg/day), fat yield (0.33 vs. 0.41 kg/day), protein yield (0.19 vs. 0.24 kg/day), lactose yield (0.21 vs. 0.27 kg/day) and ash yield (0.033 vs. 0.044 kg/day). In contrast, milk fat (80.8 g/kg), protein (45.9 g/kg), lactose (51.2 g/kg) and ash (8.2 g/kg) contents, as well as somatic cell counts (82.9 ×1000/ml) and colony forming units (44.9 ×1000/ml), were not affected (P>0.05) by parity. Milk production and quality of Greek buffalo is generally satisfactory, and may be economically beneficial for local breeders.

References

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Breeds currently recorded in the Global Databank for Animal Genetic Resources. Rome, Italy, 2007, 155 pgs.

Georgoudis, A. G., Population characteristics and production systems of water buffaloes in Greek wetlands (in Greek). Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre and Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1993, 64 pgs.

Greek Buffalo Breeders Cooperation (GBBC), Data concerning the Greek buffalo population. Vironia, Serres, Greece, 2011, Personal communication.

Chatziolos, Β., Livestock Production in Greece. The Greek Publications Co., Athens, Greece, 1941, pp. 101–106.

National Research Council (NRC), Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 1996.

Terramoccia, S., Bartocci, S., Borghese, A., Nutritional requirements in buffalo cows and heifers. In: Borghese, A. (Ed.), Buffalo Production and Research, FAO Inter-Regional Cooperative Research Network on Buffalo, REU Technical Series 67, FAO, Rome, Italy, 2005, pp. 145–160.

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC. Helrich, K. (Ed.), 15th ed. Arlington, Virginia, USA, 1990.

Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H., Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, New York, USA, 1980.

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Release 17.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2008.

Gelekis, S. B., Dairy Cattle Production (in Greek). Ed. Sinchroni Paedia, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2004, 374 pgs.

Rosati, A., Van Vleck, L. D., Estimation of genetic parameters for milk, fat, protein and mozzarella cheese production for the Italian river buffalo Bubalus bubalis population. Livestock Production Science, 2002, 74, 185–190.

Macciotta, N. P. P., Dimauro, C., Catillo, G., Coletta, A., Cappio-Borlino, A., Factors affecting individual lactation curve shape in Italian river buffaloes. Livestock Science, 2006, 104, 33–37.

Moioli, B., Georgoudis, A., Napolitano, F., Catillo, G., Giubilei, E., Ligda, Ch., Hassanane, M., Genetic diversity between Italian, Greek and Egyptian buffalo populations. Livestock Production Science, 2001, 70, 203–211.

Bartocci, S., Tripaldi, C., Terramoccia, S., Characteristics of foodstuffs and diets, and the quanti-qualitative milk parameters of Mediterranean buffaloes bred in Italy using the intensive system. An estimate of the nutritional requirements of buffalo herds lactating or dry. Livestock Production Science, 2002, 77, 45–58.

Ahmad, S., Gaucher, I., Rousseau, F., Beaucher, E., Piot, M., Grongnet, J. F., Gaucheron, F., Effects of acidification on physico-chemical characteristics of buffalo milk: A comparison with cow’s milk. Food Chemistry, 2008, 106, 11–17.

Tripaldi, C., Buffalo milk quality. In: Borghese, A. (Ed.), Buffalo Production and Research, FAO Inter-Regional Cooperative Research Network on Buffalo, REU Technical Series 67, FAO, Rome, Italy, 2005, pp. 173–183

Downloads

Published

2023-09-06