Comparative Analysis of Two DNA Extraction Methods Used in Genomic Research in Cattle

Authors

  • Madalina Alexandra Davidescu Iasi University of Life Sciences (IULS): Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, no. 3 - 700490, Iasi, Romania
  • Daniel Simeanu Iasi University of Life Sciences (IULS): Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, no. 3 - 700490, Iasi, Romania
  • Cristina Simeanu Iasi University of Life Sciences (IULS): Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, no. 3 - 700490, Iasi, Romania
  • Mihaela Ivancia Iasi University of Life Sciences (IULS): Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, no. 3 - 700490, Iasi, Romania
  • Șteofil Creangă Iasi University of Life Sciences (IULS): Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, no. 3 - 700490, Iasi, Romania

Keywords:

automatic extraction of DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid, genetic analysis, manual extraction of DNA

Abstract

DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) extraction is the first key step in the success of a genetic analysis. This research aims to validate the optimal method of DNA extraction from a number of 30 blood samples collected from Holstein cattle breed. Two methods of DNA extraction were tested, manual method (using Wizard Genomic DNA extraction kit) and automatic method (with Maxwell equipment). The results were interpreted statistically, finding that the average DNA concentration extracted by automatic method was 27.82 μg/µl compared to the average value of 18.01 μg/µl, obtained by manual method, the difference between the two values being quite high, 9.81 μg/µl. Following the application of the T-student test, with unequal variances, a value P = 1.41E-08 ˂ 0.05 resulted, which means that there are statistically significant differences regarding the concentration of the samples of DNA extracted by the two methods, the highest value of the concentration being obtained after the application of the automatic method. The accuracy of the results, the purity of the samples, the short analysis time and the lack of contamination of the samples are just some of the advantages of the automatic method of DNA extraction, which is recommended to be used in molecular genetics studies.

References

Chacon-Cortes, D., Griffiths, L., Methods for extracting genomic DNA from whole blood samples: current perspectives. Journal of Biorepository Science for Applied Medicine, 2014, 2, pp. 1-9, DOI: doi.org/10.2147/BSAM.S46573.

Koshy, L., Anju, A. L., Harikrishnan, S., Kutty, V. R., Jissa, V. T., Kurikesu, I., Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays. Mol. Biol. Rep., 2017, 44, pp. 97–108, DOI: 10.1007/s11033-016-4085-9.

Abd El-Aal, A.A., Abd-Elghany, N.A., Mohamadin, A.M., El-Badry, A.A., Comparative study of five methods for DNA extraction from whole blood samples. International Journal of Health Science, 2010, 3(1), pp. 285–287.

Lee, K., Tripathi, A., Parallel DNA Extraction from Whole Blood for Rapid Sample Generation in Genetic Epidemiological Studies. Front. Genet., 2010, 11, pp. 374. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00374.

Ali, N., Rampazzo, R., de, C. P., Costa, A. D. T., and Krieger, M. A., Current nucleic acid extraction methods and their implications to pointof-care diagnostics. BioMed Res. Int., 2017, 9, pp. 306-314, DOI: 10.1155/2017/9306564.

Chacon-Cortes, D., Haupt, L., Lea, R., Griffiths, L., Comparison of genomic DNA extraction techniques from whole blood samples: a time, cost and quality evaluation study. Mol Biol Rep., 2012, 39, pp. 5961–5966.

Mishra, P., Singh, U., Pandey, C.M., Pandey, G., Application of student's t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Ann Card Anaesth, 2019, 22(4), pp. 407-411. DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_94_19.

Feng, Y., Huang, Y., Ma, X., The application of Student’s t-test in internal quality control of clinical laboratory. Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine, 2017, 1(3), pp. 125-128, DOI.org/10.1016/j.flm.2017.09.002.

Yim, K.H., Nahm, F.S., Han, K.A., Park, S.Y., Analysis of statistical methods and errors in the articles published in the korean journal of pain. Korean J Pain, 2010, 23, pp. 35–41.

Kim, T.K., T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2015, 68(6), pp. 540-546. DOI:10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.540.

Cojocaru, D.C., Sandu, M., Protein and nucleic acid biochemistry. Publishing house PIM, Iasi, 2004, pp. 311-322.

Martins, J.P., Student t-statistic distribution for non-Gaussian populations, Proceedings of the ITI, 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2010, pp. 563-568.

Lee, H.J., Park, Y., Choi, J.R., Lee, E.K., Kim, H.S., Comparisons of three automated systems for genomic DNA extraction in a clinical diagnostic laboratory. Yonsei Med. J., 2010, 51, pp. 104-110.

Foley, C., O’Farrelly, Meade, K.G., Technical note: Comparative analyses of the quality and yield of genomic DNA from invasive and noninvasive, automated and manual extraction methods, Journal of Dairy Science, 2011, 94(6), pp. 3159-3165.

Khokhar, S.K., Mitui, M., Leos, N.K., Rogers, B.B., Park, J.Y., Evaluation of Maxwell® 16 for automated DNA extraction from whole blood and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med., 2011, 50(2), pp. 267-72.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-21