Research on the Assessment and Quality Control of Maize Silage, Produced and used in the Research-Development Station for Cattle Breeding Dancu, Iași

Authors

  • Bianca-Maria Mădescu "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Iasi, Faculty of Animal Sciences, 700490, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, no.3, Romania
  • Andra-Sabina Văleanu Research and Development Station for Cattle Breeding, 707252, Iasi-Ungheni no.9, Dancu, Iasi, Romania
  • Mădălina-Alexandra Davidescu "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Iasi, Faculty of Animal Sciences, 700490, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, no.3, Romania
  • Ioana Poroșnicu Research and Development Station for Cattle Breeding, 707252, Iasi-Ungheni no.9, Dancu, Iasi, Romania
  • Andrei-Cristian Matei Research and Development Station for Cattle Breeding, 707252, Iasi-Ungheni no.9, Dancu, Iasi, Romania
  • Șteofil Creangă "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Iasi, Faculty of Animal Sciences, 700490, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, no.3, Romania

Keywords:

Corn silage, Parameters, Quality

Abstract

The objective of this research was to observe the quality of the corn silage obtained within SCDCB Dancu, Iași at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months after silage process. The maize was sown at a distance between rows of 70 cm, its fertilization being carried out according to the soil characteristics, using 150 kg / ha NPK (16-16-16). 110-120 days after sowing, when the plants have shown the optimal stage of harvesting. In conducting this study, in order to determine the quality of corn silage, the NIR Analyzer, type Perten DA 7200 was used. The dry matter had a slight upward trend, the observed values being between 37.22% and 37.34%. The crude protein showed small variations between analyzes, the observed values being between 6.6 and 6.7%. In the present study, the values recorded for NDF ranged between 47.25 and 48.10% and the level of ADF showed values between 19.05 and 19.30%, the variations from one analysis to another being insignificant. Regarding ash, the minimum value obtained was 5.4% in the first analysis and 5.5% in the last analysis. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the analyzed corn silage has optimal qualities for its use in animal feed.

References

Matei Andrei Cristian, Bianca-Maria Mădescu, Andra Sabina Neculai-Văleanu, Elena Ruginosu, M. Amarandei, V. Vintilă, Șt. Creangă, Productivity and quality of maize hybrids for silage,"Scientific papers animal science", 2019 , Iași vol. 71;

Wang, C., He, L., Xing, Y., Zhou, W., Yang, F., Chen, X., Zhang, Fermentation quality and microbial community of alfalfa and stylo silage mixed with Moringa oleifera leaves. Bioresour Technol, 2019, 284, 240-247;

Gozubuyuk Z, Sahin U, Adiguzel MC, Dasci E., Energy use efficiency of deficitirrigated silage maize in different soil tillage practices on a high plain with a semi-arid climate, Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2019;

Kung, L., Jr., Shaver, R.D., Grant, R.J., Schmidt, R.J. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages.J Dairy Sci, 2018, 101(5), 4020-4033;

Pinto, A.P.; Lançanova, J.A.C.; Lugão, S.M.B. et al., Avaliação de doze cultivares de milho (Zea mays L.) para silagem. Revista Ciências Agrárias, 2010, v.31, n.4, p.1071-1078;

Stan I, Naescu V., Maize response to water deficit. Rom Agric Res., 1997, 7-8:77-90;

Boișteanu P. C., Mărgărint Iolanda., Fiziologia animalelor. Editura Ion Ionescu de la Brad, 2002, Iaşi;

Alves, S., A. Cabrita, E. Jerónimo, R. Bessa, and A. Fonseca., Effect of ensiling and silage additives on fatty acid composition of ryegrass and corn experimental silages. J. Anim. Sci., 2011, 89:2537–2545;

Nolan, P., Doyle, E.M., Grant, J., O'Kiely, P. Upgrading grass biomass during ensiling with contrasting fibrolytic enzyme additives for enhanced methane production. Renewable Energy, 2018, 115, 462-473;

González, J, FaríaMarmol, J, Arroyo, JM, Centeno, C and Martínez, A., Effects of ensiling on in situ ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of corn forage. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 2010, 64, 204–220;

Guan, H., Yan, Y., Li, X., Li, X., Shuai, Y., Feng, G., Ran, Q., Cai, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, X.Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunker-silo in Southwest China. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 265, 282-290;

Khan, N. A., P. Yu, M. Ali, J. W. Cone, and W. H. Hendriks., Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95:238–252;

Li, P., Zhang, Y., Gou, W., Cheng, Q., Bai, S., Cai, Y., Silage fermentation and bacterial community of bur clover, annual ryegrass and their mixtures prepared with microbial inoculants and chemical additive. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2019, 247, 285-293;

Kilic A. Silo Feed (Teaching, learning and practice suggestions). Manuel. Hasad Publ. Istanbul-Turkey, 2010;

Aydinsakir K, Erdal S, Buyuktas D, Bastug R, Toker R., The influence of regular deficit irrigation applications on water use, yield, and quality components of two corn (Zea mays L.) genotypes. Agric Water Manage, 2013, 128:65-71.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05