The Share of Internal Organs and Viscera in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Reared in Different Growth Systems

Authors

  • Daniel Cocan University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, 400372-Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur, 3-5, Romania
  • Vioara Mireşan University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, 400372-Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur, 3-5, Romania
  • Camelia Răducu University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, 400372-Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur, 3-5, Romania
  • Iulia Feştilă University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, 400372-Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur, 3-5, Romania
  • Aurelia Coroian University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, 400372-Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur, 3-5, Romania
  • Radu Constantinescu University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, 400372-Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur, 3-5, Romania
  • Octavian Negrea University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, 400372-Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur, 3-5, Romania
  • Rareş Ranga University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, 400372-Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur, 3-5, Romania

Keywords:

growth systems, internal organs, rainbow trout, slaughter yield, viscera

Abstract

In this experiment we followed the influence of growth system on the share of internal organs and viscera by the total body mass on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The importance of this study results from the need to reach as favourable slaughter yield. For this, were slaughtered 25 rainbow trout from the Fiad trout farm (conventional farm), Bistriţa-Năsăud County (control group – M), respectively 25 rainbow trout grown in a recirculating system arranged in Cluj-Napoca (experimental group – E). Body weight of the studied specimens was 228.96±1.21 g – M group, respectively 229.40±1.24 g – E group, the difference between the two groups being insignificant (p>0.05). The slaughter yield was favorable for E group – 90.55±0.03%, compared with M group – 89.23±0.05% (p<0.001). We analyzed the total gravimetric share of the internal organs and viscera at trout from the two groups and individual weights of esophagus, stomach, pyloric caeca, medium intestine and duodenum, rectum, liver, pancreas, heart, spleen, air bladder and kidney. The results showed a higher share of this organs at trout from the Fiad trout farm (M group), except stomach (2.38±0.01g – M group vs. 2.45±0.008 g – E group; p<0.05), and liver respectively (4.83±0.02 g – M group vs. 5.36±0.04 g – E group; p<0.001). In accordance with the values obtained, the resulting conclusion is that in the recirculating system, due to optimal environmental conditions, trout have a higher slaughter yield compared with those of conventional farm, accumulating in the same time fat reserves deposited in the liver.

References

Bud, I., Vlădău, V.V., Ştefan, Reka, Pop, S.N., Ladoşi, Daniela, Contributions concerning the species and age influence on fish meat qualitative index. Bulletin UASVM Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 2008, 65(1-2), 288-292.

Usturoi, M.G., Păsărin, B., Boişteanu, P.C., Fotea, Lenuţa, Industrializarea peştelui. Ed. ”Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iaşi, 2009.

Cocan, D., Mireşan, Vioara, Constantinescu, R., Răducu, Camelia, Feştilă, Iulia, Prodan, Iulia, Sărmaş I., Dinamica de creştere a păstrăvului curcubeu (Oncorhynchus mykiss) din cadrul Complexului Salmonicol Fiad-Telcişor, jud, Bistriţa-Năsăud. Scientific Papers USAMV Bucureşti, 2010, Seria D, LIII, 406-411

Bud, I., Vlădău, V., Ştefan Reka, Peştii răpitori. Creştere, înmulţire, valorificare. Ed. CERES Bucureşti, 2007.

Fornshell, G., Rainbow trout – Challenges and Solutions. Reviews in Fisherie Sciences, 2002, 10 (3-4), 545-557.

Bogé, G., Lopez, L., Pérès, G., An in vivo study of the role of pyloric caeca in water absorption in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 1988, 91(1), 9-13.

Kristjansson, M., Purification and characterization of trypsin from the pyloric caeca of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 1991, 39(10), 1738-1742.

Ulla, O., Gjedrem, T., Number and lenght of pyloric caeca and their relationship to fat and protein digestibility in rainbow trout. Aquaculture Journal, 1985, 47(2-3), 105-111.

Escaffre, A.M., Kaushik, S., Mambrini, M., Morphometric evaluation of changes in the digestive tract of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) due to fish meal replacement with soy protein concentrate. Aquaculture Journal, 2007, 273(1), 127-138.

Oprea, L., Georgescu, RODICA, Nutriţia şi alimentaţia peştilor, Ed. Tehnică, Bucureşti, 2000.

Hazel, J.R.,Influence of thermal acclimation on membrane lipid composition of rainbow trout liver, Journal of Animal Physiology, 1979, 236(1), 91-101.

Kandemir, Ş., Polat, N., Seasonal variation of total lipid and total fatty acid in muscle and liver of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss W., 1792) reared in Derbent Dam Lake, Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2007, 7,27-31.

Cărăuşu, S.,Tratat de ihtiologie, Ed. Academiei RSR, 1952, p.

Shrimpton, J.M., Randall, D.J., Fidler, L.E., Factors affecting swim bladder volume in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) held in gas supersaturated water. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1990, 68 (5), 962-968.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-06