Application of Probiotics in Poultry Production

Authors

  • Martin Král Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, 949 76-Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku, 2, Slovakia
  • Mária Angelovičová Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, 949 76-Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku, 2, Slovakia
  • Ľubica Mrázová Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, 949 76-Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku, 2, Slovakia

Keywords:

body weight, broiler chicken, GIT pH, probiotic

Abstract

In the last years probiotics have constantly increased in importance and aroused growing interest in animal nutrition. Probiotics are live microorganisms thought to be beneficial to the host organism. The bacteria of the probiotic attach to the intestinal mucosa, thereby forming a physical barrier that blocks the attachment of pathogenic bacteria. The mode of action of probiotics in poultry includes maintaining normal intestinal microflora by competitive exclusion and antagonism, altering metabolism by increasing digestive enzyme activity and decreasing bacterial enzyme activity and ammonia production, improving feed intake and digestion and neutralizing enterotoxins and stimulating the immune system. In experiment we research effect of probiotic on the performance of broiler chickens. A total number of 200 one day old broiler chickens were distributed to two dietary groups. Broiler chickens in control group were fed with standard feed mixture and experimental group with probiotics mixed with feed mixture. Body weight and GIT pH were recorded. Average body weight on the end of experiment in experimental group was 1493.6 g and 1689.6 g in control group. Average pH in experimental group was 2.79 in stomach, 6.28 in small intestine, 6.81 and 6.89 in caecum. In control group was average pH 3.54 in stomach, 6.41 in small intestine, 6.74 and 6.80 in caecum.

References

Sorum, H., Sunde, M., Resistence to antibiotics in the normal flora of animals, Veterinary Research, 2001, 32, 227–241

Burgat, V., Residues of drugs of veterinary use in food, Revue du Practicien, 1999, 41, 985–990

Andremont, A., Consequences of antibiotic therapy to the intestinal ecosystem, Ann. Fr. Anesth. Reanim., 2000, 19, 395–402

Corcionivoschi N. et. al., The effect of probiotics on animal health, Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 2010, 43(1), 35-41

Rolfe, R. D., The role of probiotic cultures in the control of gastrointestinal health, The Journal of Nutrition, 2000, 130, 396-402

Lan, P. T., Binh, T., Benno, Y., Impact of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains feeding on fecal lactobacilli and weight gains in chicken, Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 2003, 49, 29–36

Kalavathy, R., Abdullah, N., Jalaludin, S., Ho, Y. W., Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens, British Poultry Science, 2003, 44, 139-144

Kabir, S. M. L., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. B., Rahman, M. M., Ahmed, S. U., The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers, International Journal of Poultry Science, 2004, 3, 361-364

Gil De Los Santos, J. R., Storch, O. B., Gil-Turnes, C., Bacillus cereus var. toyoii and Saccharomyces boulardii increasedfeed efficiency in broilers infected with Salmonella Enteritidis, British Poultry Science, 2003, 46, 494-497

La Ragione, R. M., Casula, G., Cutting, S. M., Woodward, M. J., Bacillus subtilis spores competitively exclude Escherichia coli O78:K80 in poultry., Vet. Microbiol., 2001, 79, 133–142

Weis J., Hrncar, C., Pal, G., Baranska, B., Bujko, J., Malikova, L., Effect of probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M74 supplementation on the carcass parameters of different hybrid combination chickens, Scientific Papers, Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 2011, 44 (1), 149-152

Al-Natour, M. Q., Alshawabkeh, K. M., Using varying levels of formic acid to limit growth of Salmonella gallinarum in contaminated broiler feed, Asian Australas., Journal of Animal Science, 2005, 18, 390-395

Haščík, P., Čuboň, J., Horniaková, E., Krivánek, L., Kulíšek, V., Relationship between probiotic preparation application and abdominal fat amount in chickens, Agriculture, 2007, 51, 574–579

Collins, M.D., Gibson, G.R., Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut., The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1999, 69, 1052S–1057S

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05