An Example for the “Transit-Heterosis” in the Non-Return Rate of Upgraded Dairy Genotypes

Authors

  • Zsolt Nemes Agricultural and Industrial Combine of Becej Stock Holding Company, 2122- Bečej, Novosadska 2, Serbia
  • Radica Đedović University of Belgrad, Faculty of Agricultural Science, 11080-Zemun, Nemanjina, 6, Serbia
  • Vitomir Vidović University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agricultural Science, 21000-Novi Sad, Sqr. Dositeja Obradovića 8, Serbia
  • Ferenc Eszes Szent István University, Faculty for Veterinary Science, 1078-Budapest, István, 2, Hungary
  • András Gáspárdy Szent István University, Faculty for Veterinary Science, 1078-Budapest, István, 2, Hungary

Keywords:

dairy crossing, grading-up breeding program, heterosis, Holstein-Friesian, non-return rate

Abstract

The research aim of the authors was to evaluate the success of the heterosis manifested in the non-return rate regarding an upgrading breeding system in Serbia.
The data base contains altogether 27,241 records of the initial purebred Simmental and Holstein-Friesian cows as well as of the six intermediate Holstein-Frisian crossed genotypes, from the last four decades (1971-2008).
In the non-return rate calculated by pp day 70 and 210 the Simmentals, together with the F1-R3 genotypes, regularly reached higher values than the purebred Holsteins, together with the R4-R5 genotypes, to a significant degree (p<0.001).
The heterosis appeared at dissimilar direction and extent in the non-return rate calculated by different pp days. With regards to the success of re-breeding by pp day 70, a statistically proven, positive complementary effect, which was emerging in R2, occurred in all the crossed generations. Evaluating the re-breeding by pp days 210, the recombination along with the heterosis became negative in R5 generation, while the heterosis remained positive, also favourable in all the other genotypes.
The authors presented the transit-heterosis in case of R2 and R5, where the previous superiority became lost and the advantage became negative over time, respectively.

References

Abdallah, J.M., McDaniel, B.T., Genetic Parameters and Trends of Milk, Fat, Days Open, and Body Weight After Calving in North Carolina Experimental Herds, J. Dairy Sci., 2000, 83(6), 364-1370

Bozó, S., Kovács, K., Gábor, Gy., Györkös, I., Völgyi, Csík J., Holstein-fríz bikák termelési és szaporodásbiológiai tulajdonságokban, valamint selejtezési okokban kimutatott örökítő értékei közötti összefüggések. Állattenyésztés és takarmányozás, 1999, 48(3), 301–313

Marti, C.F., Funk, D.A., Relationship between Production and Days Open at Different Levels of Herd Production, J. Dairy Sci., 1994. 77(6), 1682-1690

VanRaden, P.M., Sanders, A.H. et al., Development of a National Genetic Evaluation for Cow Fertility, J. Dairy Sci., 2004, 87(7), 2285-2292

Hare, E., Norman, H.D. et al., Trends in Calving Ages and Calving Intervals for Dairy Cattle Breeds in the United States, J. Dairy Sci., 2006, 89(1), 365-370

Szenci, O., Varga, J., Bajcsy, Á.Cs., Role of early pregnancy diagnosis by means of ultrasonography in improving reproductive efficiency in a dairy herd: A retrospective study. The Bov. Practitioner, 1999, 33. 67-69

Heins, B.J., Hansen, L.B. et al., Fertility and Survival of Pure Holsteins Versus Crossbreds of Holstein whit Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red, J. Dairy Sci., 2006, 89(12), 4944–4951

Norman, H.D., Wright, J.R. et al., Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States, J. Dairy Sci., 2009, 92(7), 3517-3528

Dematawewa, C.M.B., Berger, P.J., Genetic and Phenotypic Parameters for 305-Day Yield, Fertility, and Survival in Holsteins, J. Dairy Sci., 1998, 81(10), 2700-2709

Ettema, J.F., Santos, J.E.P., Impact of Age at Calving on Lactation, Reproduction, Health, and Income in First-Parity Holsteins on Commercial Farms, J. Dairy Sci., 2004, 87(8), 2730-2742

Madrid, S.I., Olson, T.A. et al., Evaluation of the effects of heterosis on reproductive efficiency and milk yield in South Florida, J. Dairy Sci., 2004, 87:(Suppl. 1). 4

The Dairy Industry in Israel. Israel Cattle Breeders Association, Israel Dairy Board, 2006.

Djurđević, R., Genetička analiza mlečnosti i reprodukcijskih svojstava krava simentalske rase. Doktorska disertacija. Novi Sad, 2001.

Perišić, P., Reproduktivne i proizvodne osobine simentalske rase pri kombinovanom smeru proizvodnje i sistemu krava-tele. Doktorska disertacija. Poljoprivredni Fakultet, Beograd–Zemun, 2008.

Skalicki, Z., Fenotipska varijabilnost i povezanost reproduktivnih i proizvodnih osobina austrijskog i nemačkog simentalca u istim uslovima gajenja. Magistarski rad. Beograd, 1983.

Nenadović, M., Pejić, N. et al., Istraživanje optimalne tehnologije odgajivanja junica i njihovog uvodjenja u priplod. „Savremena Poljoprivreda“, Novi Sad, 1988, 36(1-2), 5-16.

Dechow, C.D., Rogers, G.W. et al., Milk, Fat, Protein, Somatic Cell Score, and Days Open Among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and Their Crosses, J. Dairy Sci., 2007, 90(7), 3542-3549.

Szűcs, E., Bódis K. et al., Modellvizsgálatok tejtípusú szarvasmarhán a reproduktív teljesítmény értelmezéséhez. Állattenyésztés és takarmányozás, 2000, 49(4), 313-329

Swalve, H.H., Bergk, N. et al., Kreuzungszucht beim Milchrind–Ergebnisse aus einem Praxisbetrieb. Züchtungskunde, 2008, 80(6), 429- 442

Mucsi, I., A szarvasmarha szabályos és rendellenes szervíz periódusa, Állattenyésztés és takarmányozás, 1988, 37(3), 193-198

Szenci, O., Simonsen, I. et al., A plazma urea-N-koncentrációja és a vemhesülés közötti összefüggés vizsgálata egy holstein-ríz tehenészetben. Magy. Állatorv. Lapja, 2003, 125, 458-464

Zöldág, L., Hamar, Gy., Fenes, P., A tejtermelés és a reprodukció összefüggéseinek vizsgálata magyartarka és F1 szarvasmarha-állományokban, Magy. Állatorv. Lapja, 1982, 37(1), 52-55

Skalicki, Z., Latinović, D. et al., Fenotipske karakteristike reproduktivnih osobina crno-belih goveda sa različitom proporcijom gena holštajn-frizijske rase. Zbornik radova Poljoprivrednog Fakulteta Beograd, 1991, 33-44.

Sörensen, M.K., Norberg, E. et al., Invited Review: Crossbreeding in Dairy Cattle: A Danish Perspective, J. Dairy Sci., 2008, 91(11), 4116–4128

Touchberry, R.W., Crossbreeding Effects in Dairy Cattle: The Illinois Experiment: 1949 to 1969, J. Dairy Sci., 1992, 75(2), 640-667

McDowell, R.E., Velasco, J.A. et al., Reproductive Efficiency of Purebred and Crossbreed Dairy Cattle, J. Dairy Sci., 1974, 57(12), 220-234

Schichtl, V., Einfluss der Kreuzung von Deutschen Holsteins und Deutschem Fleckvieh auf Milchleistung, Milchqualität und allgemeine Gesundheitsmerkmale in einem automatischen Melksystem. Inaugural-Dissertation. München, 2007.

Gavrilović, S., Proizvodni efekti ukrštanja goveda u uslovima PIK-a „Bečej“. Poljoprivreda, 1981, 21-29. 274-275.

StatSoft, Inc. (2011). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. www.statsoft.com.

Ziegler, A., Lange, S. et al., Überlebenszeitanalyse: Die Cox-Regression - Artikel Nr. 17 der Statistik-Serie in der DMW. Survival analysis. Cox regression. Dtsch med Wochenschr, 2007, 132, e42-e44.

Egger-Danner, Ch., Analyse von Heterosiseffekten in österreichischen Rinderpopulationen. Seminar, ZAR, Salzburg, 2005.

Fabian, G. Ernhaft, J., Varga M., Growth Equations and Late Morphogenesis of Quantitative Characters. Genetics today. Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Genetics (ed.: Geerts, S.J.), The Hague, The Netherlands, September 1963, Section 10. - Developmental Genetics (10.39.). 1. 181-182.

Komisijski zapisnik. Smotra krava 2011.”PIK-BEČEJ” RJ „Govedarstvo”, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05