Growth and Carcass Composition Response of Different Protein Food Level for Ross 308 Hybrid Reared in Organic System

Authors

  • Eliza Simiz Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, 300645, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Dan Drinceanu Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, 300645, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Lavinia Ștef Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, 300645, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Florica Irina Mic S.C. AVE IMPEX SRL, 440111 Satu Mare, Soimoseni no. 32, Romania
  • Călin Julean Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, 300645, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Robert Nagy Voinea Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, 300645, Calea Aradului 119, Romania

Keywords:

protein level, organic system, carcass composition, broilers

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to assess the impact of various protein levels and of the administration periods of concentrate mixture (CM) on the growth and carcass composition in Ross 308 hybrid ecologically raised. The experiment was conducted over a period of 84 days on a flock of 108 chickens belonging to Ross 308 commercial hybrid. There were three experimental groups consisting of 36 chickens. The chickens were fed with the tri-phase feeding program in G1, and with the bi-phase feeding program in G2 and G3, as follows: G1 and G2 with the same period of administration of CM and with close protein levels, but in G2 the biological value of the protein in CM starter was higher. G3 chickens were fed with the bi-phase feeding program, respectively 1-28 days and 29-84 days where the protein level was of 20.94 % and 16.98 % CP. Chickens in G2 and G3 received the same CM starter structure with a protein level of 20.94 % with an upper VB. Statistical analysis of the received results was performed by the IBM SPSS 19 software using the analysis of the variant and the testing of significance with ANOVA test complemented by Tukey posthoc test. It can be appreciated that the body weight was significantly influenced (G2 -3826.33 g, and in G3 -3669.96 g) by incorporating an animal protein source (boiled egg) in the CM structure, which after a good start allows the application of a two-phase feeding technology (in G3), which significantly simplifies the growing process of broilers. This experimental scheme did not cause significant differences in the quality of meat or in the weight of the cut-up parts of the broiler carcasses.

References

Hermansen, J. E., Organic livestock production systems and appropriate development in relation to public expectations. Livest. Prod. Sci., 2003, 80:3-15.

Grunert, K. G., Bredahl L. and Brunso K., Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector - a review. Meat Sci., 2004, 69:259-272.

Vucasović, T., Attitude towards organic meat an empirical investigation on West Balkans countries (WBC) consumers, World`s Poultry Science Journal, 2013, vol. 69, Sept., p. 527-540.

Castellini C., Mugnai C. and Dal Bosco A., Effect of conventional versus organic method of production on the broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2002, 60:219-225.

Castellini C., Dal Bosco A., Mugnai C. and Bernardini M., Performance and behaviour of chickens with different growing rate reared according to the organic system. Italian Journal Animal Science, 2003, 1:291.

Latter-Dubois, E.. Poulets fermiers: Leurs qualités nutritionnelles et organoleptiques et la perception du consommateur. M.S. Faculté des Sciences de l’Agriculture et de L’Alimentation. Univ. Laval, Quebec, Canada, 2000.

Holcman A., Vadnjal, R., Zlecher, B., Stibilj Vekoslova, Chemical composition of chichen meat from free range and extensive indoor rearing, Arch. Geflügels, 2003, 67(3): 120-124.

Marcu, A., Vacaru-Opris, I., Dumitrescu, G., Marcu, A., Petculescu-Ciochină, L., Nicula, M., Dronca, D., Kelciov, B., Effect of Diets with Different Energy and Protein Levels on Breast Muscle Characteristics of Broiler Chickens, Scientific Papers: Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 2013, 46(1): 333- 340.

Ristic, M., Influence of breed and weight loss on the carcass values of broilers. In XII-th European Symposium Quality of Poultry Meat, Doorwert, The Netherlands, 2005, p. 23-26.

Firman, J.D. and S.D. Boling, Ideal protein in turkeys. Poult. Sci.,1998, 77:105-110.

Gheorghe (Vasile), A., Dragotoiu, D., Ciurescu, G., Lefter, N., Hăbeanu, M., Effect of Dietary Protein Level on Protein Deposition in Broilers: 1. Productive performance and Carcass Characteristics, Bulletin UASVM Animal Science and Biotechnologies 70(2), 2013, 266-273.

Cziszter, L.T., Szucs, E., Sossidou, E.N., Bazele relației dintre bunăstarea animală şi calitatea produsului, Ed. AGROPRINT, Timişoara, 2010.

Sundrum A., Schneider, K. and Richter, U., Possibilities and limitation of protein supply in organic poultry and pig production, Join the Organic Congress, Odense, Denmark, May 30-31, 2006.

Simiz, E., Creşterea păsărilor în sistem ecologic. Editura Eurobit, Timişoara, 2012.

Widyaratne, G.P. and Drew, M.D., Effects of protein level and digestibility on the growth and characteristics of broiler chickens, Poult. Sci., 2011, Mar. 90(3): 595-603.

Faria Filho, K.A., Alfonso-Torres, D.M.B., Campos, P.S., Rosa, M. and Furlan, R.L., High protein diets for heat-exposed broilers, 2006, EPC, XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy, 10-14 Sept.

Mic, F. I., Drinceanu, D., Simiz E., Ştef, L., Gherasim, V., Influence of feed protein intake on major parties of carcass Tetra H chicks reared in organic system, Scientific Papers: Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 2013, 46(1): 34-39.

NRC, National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. ed. 1994, Washington D.C. National Academy of Sciences. National Research Council.

SPSS, Statistics version 22.0. IBM SPSS Inc, USA.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05