Research Regarding the Influence of Sesonality on the Estrus Induction and Synchronization Treatments with PRID, in Dairy Cows

Authors

  • Ciolac Casiana Șipețan Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Ioan Bencsik Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Dorel Dronca Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Eliza Simiz Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Ioan Peț Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Gabi Dumitrescu Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Valeriu Carabă Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Marioara Nicula Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Adela Marcu Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Liliana Petculescu Ciochină Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Mirela Ahmadi Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania
  • Nicolae Păcală Bat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, 300645-Timisora, Calea Aradului, 119, Romania

Keywords:

milk cows, PRID, seasonal influence, pregnancy rate

Abstract

The season of performing treatments can affect the results obtained after treatment of induction and synchronization of estrus in dairy cows.

Synchronization treatments were performed with PRID-Intervet, which contains 1.55 grams of progesterone. The devices were inserted in to the vagina and withdrawn after 12 days, in the next five days they found that females were in heat and A. I. The treatments were conducted in the spring season (April-May), summer (July-August) and autumn (September-October).

In spring season the females in heat rate was 70.83%, in summer it was 68.18% and in autumn the rate was 100.0%. Pregnancy rate was 82.35% in spring season, 26.66% in summer and 92.3% in autumn. The best results were obtained in autumn, although the worst in the summer season.

References

Grimard B., P. Humblot, A. A. Ponter, S. Chastant, F. Constant, J. P. Mialot.. Efficacité des traitements de synchronisation des chaleurs chez les bovins, INRA Prod. Anim., 2003, 16(3), 211-227.

Mialot J. P., Noel F., Puyalto C., Laumonier G., Sauveroche B., Traitement de l’anoestrus post-partum chez la vache laitière par le CIDR-E ou la prostaglandine F2α, Bulletin Technique des GTV, 1998, 2, 29-38.

Alnimer M., De Rosa G., Grasso F., Napolitano F., Bordi A., Effect of climate on the response to three oestrus synchronization techniques in lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 200, 271, 157-168.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05