The Effect of Immunocastration on Some Meat Quality Characteristics
Keywords:
immunocastration, meat, pigsAbstract
Surgical castration of male pigs has become increasingly less accepted at present due to the fact that it is a direct animal welfare concern. UE welfare conditions demand that this method be dropped starting 2018 in order to eliminate the stress and associated pain it induces. Immunocastration is one of the alternatives to surgical castration that ensures male pig welfare and eliminates the boar smell of the meat. The objective of this research has been to identify the immunocastration effects on meat quality, compared with the meat from surgically castrated pigs. The animals assessed during research were fattening PIC pigs, grouped into two lots: surgically castrated pigs (SC) and immunocastrated pigs (IC). Pig immunization was achieved by means of ImprovacTM. The results have shown that immunocastrated pigs recorded a 60.2% carcass meat compared to the 59.69% carcass meat achieved in surgically castrated pigs, thus displaying statistically insignificant differences (p>0.05). Fat layer thickness was significantly lower in immunocastrated pigs compared to the marker lot (p≤0.05). Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae lung lesions recorded were lower in immunocastrated pigs compared to the surgically castrated animals (p>0.05). Despite the fact that differences have been statistically insignificant, we are able to confirm that immunocastrated pigs display a lower incidence of respiratory disease compared to surgically castrated pigs. In this study there were not significant differences in meat quality between surgically castrated pigs and immunocastrated pigs.
References
EFSA, Welfare aspects of the castration of piglets. Scientific report of the scientific panel for animal health and welfare on request from the commission related to welfare aspects of the castration of piglets European food safety authority AHAW / 04 – 087, http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/ahaw_opinions/512_it.html.
Ge Backus, CAMPIG: consumer acceptance in the EU and in 3rd countries of pig meat obtained from male pigs not surgically castrated, Workshop on alternatives to pig castration, 2015, Brussels.
Bonneau M., Prunier A, Alternatives to piglet castration. In Proceedings of the 56th European association of animal production, 2005, S27: 5–8 June, Uppsala, Sweden.
Font i Furnols M., Gispert M., Guerrero L., Velarde A., Tibau J., Soler J., Hortos M., García-Regueiro J. A., Perez J., Suarez P., Oliver M.A., Consumers’ sensory acceptability of pork from immunocastrated male pigs, Meat Science, 2008, 80: 1013-1018.
Gispert, M., Oliver, M. À., Velarde, A., Suarez, P., Perez, J., Font i Furnols, M., Carcass and meat quality characteristics of immunocastrated male, surgically castrated male, entire male and female pigs, Meat Science, 2010, 85: 664-670.
Pauly C., Spring P., O’Doherty J.V., Ampuero Kragten S., Bee G., Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of group-penned surgically castrated, immunocastrated (Improvac®) and entire male pigs and individually penned entire male
Pigs, Animal, 2009, 3:1057–1066.
