Improving Sausage Quality with Buckwheat Flour

Authors

  • Roxana-Georgiana Bobeică „Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iași
  • Gabriel Vasile Hoha „Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iași
  • Benone Păsărin „Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iași
  • Alexandra Tanasa „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, 11 Carol I Boulevard, Iași, Romania

Keywords:

buckwheat flour, chemical composition, food industry, meat products, nutritive value, sausages

Abstract

The growing demand for nutritionally enhanced meat products has stimulated interest in plant-based functional ingredients. This study investigated the effect of partial pork fat replacement with buckwheat flour (Fagopyrum esculentum) at five substitution levels — 20 g, 40 g, 60 g, 80 g, and 100 g per standard batch — on the physicochemical and organoleptic properties of fresh sausages. A control formulation (lean pork: pork belly: spices, with 0 g buckwheat flour) was produced alongside five experimental variants. Chemical composition (lipid, protein, moisture, and NaCl content) was determined using a Food Check automatic analyzer according to STAS standards for fresh sausages. Organoleptic evaluation (color, smell, texture, taste, juiciness, and overall assessment) was conducted by a trained sensory panel of seven evaluators using a 10-point hedonic scale. Physicochemical analysis showed full compliance with STAS admissibility conditions across all samples. Protein content increased progressively from 15.71% (Sample 1) to 16.15% (Sample 5), surpassing the minimum requirement of 9%, while lipid content remained well below the maximum of 35%. Moisture content in experimental samples (49.14%–50.02%) was substantially lower than in the control (60%), which correlated with sensory differences in juiciness. Organoleptic assessment identified Sample 3 (60 g buckwheat flour) as the optimal formulation, achieving an overall score of 9.50/10, comparable to the control (9.80/10). Samples incorporating more than 60 g of buckwheat flour received significantly lower sensory scores, with Sample 5 rated unacceptable. The results demonstrate that buckwheat flour can be incorporated as a partial fat replacer at up to 60 g per batch without compromising sensory acceptability, while maintaining acceptable lipid levels and improving the protein balance of fresh sausages.

References

Dani V., Pabalkar V. Exploring Consumer Behaviour Towards Fast-Food Industry: A case study on Pune. Indian Journal of Applied Research. 2018;3(9):324–337.

Bahmanyar F., Hosseini S. M., Mirmoghtadaie L., Shojaee-Aliabadi S. Effects of replacing soy protein and bread crumb with quinoa and buckwheat flour in functional beef burger formulation. Meat Science. 2021;172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108305

Uzakov Y. M., Kenenbai S. Y., Kuznetsova O.N., Koshoeva T. R., Yesengazieva A. N., Kaimbayeva L. A. Using a functional component in the production of cooked smoked sausage. Meat Industry Journal. 2021:49–52. https://doi.org/10.37861/2618-8252-2021-04-49-52

Banu C. (coord.). Technical, Technological and Scientific Advances in the Food Industry. Bucharest: Technical Publishing House; 1993.

Banu C. (coord.). Quality and Sensory Analysis of Food Products. Bucharest: AGIR Publishing House; 2007.

Neacsu M., Vaughan N. J., Multari S., Haljas E., Scobbie L., Duncan G. J., Cantlay L., Fyfe C., Anderson S., Horgan G., Johnstone A. M., Russell W. R. Hemp and buckwheat are valuable sources of dietary amino acids, beneficially modulating gastrointestinal hormones and promoting satiety in healthy volunteers. European Journal of Nutrition. 2022;61:1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02711-z

Vostrikova N. L., Zherdev A. V., Zvereva E. A., Chernukha I. M. Quality and Safety of Meat Products in Russia: Results of Monitoring Samples from Manufacturers and Evaluation of Analytical Methods. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science. 2020;8:41–47. https://doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.8.1.04

Baburina M. I., Vostrikova N. L., Ivankin A. N., Zenkin A. N. Biochemical transformation of natural lipids: a review. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing. 2018;3:12–26. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2018-3-3-12-26

Kaltovich I., Savelyena T., Antipina A. Analysis of prospective types of legumes and cereals and their processing products for use as part of combined meat products. Topical Issues of Processing of Meat and Milk Raw Materials. 2021;15:194–206. https://doi.org/10.47612/2220-8755-2020-15-194-206

Popescu A. M., et al. Nutritional profiling of gluten-free additives in traditional Balkan meat products. Journal of Food Quality. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1155/2025/foodquality

López-Sánchez P., et al. Buckwheat flour as a multifunctional ingredient in meat analogues and hybrid sausages: Impact on protein oxidation and water binding. Food Hydrocolloids. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109452

Zhang Y., Meat Science Group. Technological challenges in fat-replaced meat products: The role of pseudocereal fibers. Meat Science. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109120

Panagiotopoulou E., Moschakis T., Katsanidis E. Sunflower oil organogels and organogel-in-water emulsions (Part II): Implementation in frankfurter sausages. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 2016;73:351–356.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01