Improving Welfare of Layers by Ash Bath Possibility
Keywords:
behaviour, dustbathing, hen, welfareAbstract
The purpose of this work was to study effect of access restriction to dusting substrate on hens behaviour. Forty laying hens from furnished cages (FC) and nonfurnished cages (NC) at the age of 28 weeks were used. The observations were performed in an experimental aviary equipped with dust bath of ash. The water obstructed the access to the ash bath. The first level of difficulty was without water; the others included water for an increased difficulty. Times of eating were higher in FC group. Locomotion and standing were longer in NC group during all difficulties. The length of vacuum dustbathing was shorter in FC group than NC group (1.2 min vs. 4.2 min) per one hour of observation. The average length of normal dustbathing represented 6.6 min (FC) or 5.4 min per hour (NC). Results suggested that dustbathing is under the control of external factors, especially of former housing. Deprivation of the normal dustbathing was not a sufficient cause for suffering in hens.
References
Liere van, D. W., The significance of fowls' bathing in dust, Animal Welfare, 1992, 1, 187-202
Liere van, D. W., Aggrey, S. E., Brouns, F. M. R., and Wiepkema, P. R., Oiling behaviour and the effect of lipids on dustbathing behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus), Behaviour, 1991, 24, 71-81
Liere van, D. W., Bokma, S., Short-term feather maintenance as a function of dust-bathing in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1987, 18, 197-204
Duncan, I. J. H., Widowski, T. M., Malleau, A. E., Linberg, A. C., and Petherick, J. C., External factors and causation of dust bathing in domestic hens, Behavioral Processes, 1998, 43, 219-228
Petherick, J. C., Behaviour of young domestic fowl directed towards different substrates, British Poultry Science, 1989, 30, 229-238
Wells, R. G., Laying hens. In: Management and Welfare of Farm Animals. R. Ewbank, F. Kim-Madslien, and C. B. Hart, Ed. UFAW Farm Handbook, Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Herts AL4 8AN, UK, pp. 193-233
Rodenburg, T. B., Tuyttens, F. A. M., and Sonck, B., Welfare, health, and hygiene of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systems, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2005, 8, 211–226
Petherick, J. C., Seawright, E., and Waddington, D., Influence of motivational state on choice of food or a dustbathing/foraging substrate by domestic hens, Behav. Proc., 1993, 28, 209-220
Orság, J., Brouček, J., Mačuhová, L., Knížatová, M., Flak, P., and Hanus, A., Behaviour of hens deprivated to dustbathing, Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 44, in the press
Lindberg, A. C., and Nicol, C. J., Dustbathing in modified battery cages: Is sham dustbathing an adequate substitute? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1997, 55, 113-128
Petherick, J. C., Waddington, D., Duncan, I. J. H., and Murphy, L., The role of perception in the causation of dust bathing behaviour in domestic fowl, Animal Behaviour, 1995, 49, 1521-1530
Hogan, J. A., and van Boxel, F., Causal factors controlling dust bathing in Burmese red junglefowl: some results and a model, Animal Behaviour, 1993, 46, 627-635
Vestergard, K., Dust-bathing in the domestic fowl: diurnal rhythm and dust deprivation, Applied Animal Ethology, 1982, 8, 487–495
Barnett, J. L., Tauson, R., Downing, J. A., Janardhana, V., Lowenthal, J. W., Butler, K. L., and Cronin, G. M., The effects of a perch, dust bath, and nest box, either alone or in combination as used in furnished cages, on the welfare of laying hens, Poultry Science, 2009, 88, 456-470
Colson, S., Arnould, C., and Michel, V., Motivation to dust-bathe of laying hens housed in cages and in aviaries, Animal, 2007, 1, 433-437
Sørensen, J. T., Sandøe, P., and Halberg, N., Animal welfare as one among several values to be considered at farm level: The idea of an ethical account for livestock farming, Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Anim. Sci. Suppl., 2001, 30, 11-16
Olsson, I. A. S., and Keeling, L. J., Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2005, 93, 259-282
