The Effect of Probiotics on the Microbial Properties and Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens

Authors

  • Dávid Štofan Slovak University of Agriculture v Nitre, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. Andreja Hlinku 2 , 949 76 Nitra. Tel.: 00421/37/641 5808
  • Kamil Močár Slovak University of Agriculture v Nitre, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. Andreja Hlinku 2 , 949 76 Nitra. Tel.: 00421/37/641 5808
  • Daniela Liptaiová Slovak University of Agriculture v Nitre, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. Andreja Hlinku 2 , 949 76 Nitra. Tel.: 00421/37/641 5808
  • Mária Angelovičová Slovak University of Agriculture v Nitre, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. Andreja Hlinku 2 , 949 76 Nitra. Tel.: 00421/37/641 5808

Keywords:

Body weight, caecum properties, intestinal microflora, probiotics

Abstract

In this study was examined the probiotic effect of the Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 on the production growth and health of broiler chickens in conditions of welfare. The animals had a free access to feedstuff and water. The experiment was carried out on broiler types Cobb 500. The welfare, body weight of broiler chickens at the end of each cycle was interpreted. The breeding was kept in the terms of welfare. The viability in trial group (fed with feedstuff enriched with probiotic Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515) was 100% while in the control group the viability was 97 %. The average body weight at the end of experiment of chickens in control group was 1567.20 g while the average body weight of chickens in trial group was 1580.8 g. The difference between these two groups was not significant (P>0.05). Samples of caecal chime were acquired and the number of Enterococcus sp. from 6.52to 6.59 log cfu.g-1, the number of Lactobacillus sp. from 8.55 to 8.75 log cfu.g-1, and the number of Enterobacteriaceae sp. from 7.45 to 7.81 log cfu.g-1 was determined in the trial group.

References

Delaquis, P. J., Stanich, K., Girard, B., Mazza, G., Antimicrobial activity of individual and mixed fractions of dill, cilantro, coriander and eucalyptus essential oils, In: International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2002., 74, 101– 109

Fuller R. J.: Probiotics. The Scientific Basis. Chapman and Hall, London, New York 1992, 8, 398.

Patterson, J. A., Burkholder, M.,K. (): Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, 2003, 82, 627-631

Line, E.,J., Bailey, S.,J., Cox, N. A., Stern, N. J., Tompkins, T., Effect of yeast-supplemented feed on Salmonella and Campylobacter populations in broilers, Poultry Science, 1998, 77, 405-410

Mountozouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., Fegeros, K., Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Probiotic Containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus Strains in Promoting Broiler Performance and Modulating Cecal Microflora Composition and Metabolic Activities. Poultry Science, 2007, 86, 309-317

Kabir, S. M. L., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. B., Rahman, M. M., Ahmed S.U., The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2004, 3, 361-364

Yang, Y., Iji, P.A., Choct, M., Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: a review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. World's Poultry Science Journal, 2009, 65, 97-114

Li, X., Qiang, L., Liu Xu, C. H., Effects of supplementation of fructooligosaccharide and/or Bacillus subtilis to diets on performance and on intestinal microflora in broilers. Archiv fur Tierzucht, 2008, 51, 1, 64-70

Mohan, B., Kadirvel, R., Natarajan, A., Bhaskaran, M., Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth, nitrogen utilisation and serum cholesterol in broilers. British Poultry Science, 1996, 37, 395-401

Abdulrahim, S. M., Haddadin, M. S. Y., Hashlamoun, E. A. R., Robinson, R. K., The influence of Lactabacillus acidophilus and bacitracin on layer performance of chickens and cholesterol content of plasma and egg yolk. British Poultry Science, 1996, 37, 341-346

Tortuero, F., Fernandez, E., Effects of inclusion of microbial cultures in barley-based diets fed to laying hens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1995, 53, 255

Nahashon, S. N., Nakaue, H. S., Mirosh, L. W., Production variables and nutritient retention in Single Comb White Leghorn laying pullets fed diets supplemented with direct-fed microbials. Poultry Science, 1994a, 73, 1699-1711

Maiolin, R., Fioretti, A., Menna, L. F., Meo, C., Research of the efficiency of probiotics in diets for broiler chickens. Nutrition Abstract and Review Series B, 1992, 62, 482

STN EN ISO 4833, 1997, Mikrobiológia potravín a krmív. Horizontálna metóda na stanovenie počtu mikroorganizmov. Metóda počítania kolónií kultivovaných pri 30 °C

Schrezenmeir, J., De Vresse, M., Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics - approaching and definition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2001, 73, 361-364

Tannock, G. W., 2002, Probiotics and prebiotics: Where are we going? Otago : Caister Academic Press, 2002, pp. 336

Jin, L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N., Ali, M. A., and Jalaludin, S., Antagonistic effects of intestinal Lactobacillus isolates on pathogens of chicken. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 1996, 23, 67–71

La Ragione, R. M., Casula, G., Cutting, S. M., and Woodward, M. J., Bacillus subtilis spores competitively exclude Escherichia coli O78:K80 in poultry. Vet. Microbiol., 2001, 79, 133–142

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01