ANIMAL WELFARE AND ECONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS IN BULGARIA AND EU FARMS

Authors

  • TSVETANA HARIZANOVA Institute of Animal Science, Kostinbrod, Bulgaria
  • MARYA PENEVA Institute of Animal Science, Kostinbrod, Bulgaria

Keywords:

Animal welfare, Economic effectiveness, Pig breeding, Cattle breeding

Abstract

In this study the relationship between economic effectiveness and animal welfare standards
is investigated in the case of the pig and cattle breeding. The issue is of importance in order
to assess economic viability of livestock breeding while applying animal friendly practices.
This paper considers animal welfare standards in national regulations in pig breeding and
cattle breeding, production under animal welfare and economic effectiveness in the
specified sectors. It is pointed out the conditions which the legislation lays down to ensure
better animal welfare. The discussion continues with detailed examination of the applying
these standards in the production process. At the end of the paper are presented main
conclusions concerning economic efficiency under animal welfare standards. The aim of
the paper is to analyse the interactions between the economic effectiveness of livestock
production and animal welfare in the pig breeding and cattle breeding.

References

Arey, D. and P. Brooke. 2006. Animal welfare aspects of good agricultural

practice: pig production. Compassion in world farming trust. pp. 33-49.

Armstrong, D.V. 1994. Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. J.

Dairy Sci. 77:2044-2050.

Armstrong D.V. and P.E. Hillman. 1998. Effect of cold stress on dairy

cattle performance. In: Proc. Colorado Nutrition Conference, Greeley, CO.

Batchelder, T.L. 2000. The impact of head gates and overcrowding on

production and behavior patterns on lactating dairy cows. In: Proc. Of the 2000

Dairy Housing and Equipment Systems: Managing and planning for profitability.

NRAES publication 129. pp 325-330.

Bolinger,D. J., J.L. Albright, J. Morrow-Tesch, S. J. Kenyon, M. D.

Cunningham, 1997. The effects of restraint using self-locking stanchions on dairy

cows in relation to behavior, feed intake, physiological parameters, health and milk

yield. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2411-2417.

Chastain, J. P. 2000. Designing and managing natural ventilation system.

In: Proc. Of the 2000 Dairy Housing and Equipment Systems: Managing and

planning for profitability. NRAES publication 129. pp. 147-163.

Chastain, J., L. Jacoboson, J. Beehler and J. Martens, 1997. Improved

lighting and ventilation systems for dairy facilities: its effects on herd health and

milk production. In: Proc. Fifth Int. Livestock Housing Conference. Pp 827-835.

Dahl, G. E., 2000. Photoperiod management of dairy cows. In: Proc. Of

the 2000 Dairy Housing and Equipment Systems: Managing and planning for

profitability. NRAES publication 129. pp 131-136.

Fox, D.G. and T. P. Tylutki. 1998. Accounting for the effects of

environment on the nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 81: 3085-

McDowell, R.E.,E. G. Moody, P. J. Van Soest, R. P. Lehman and G. L.

Ford. 1969. Effects of heat stress on energy and water utilization of lactating dairy

cows. J. Dairy Sci. 52: 188.

McInerney, J. 2004. Animal Welfare, Economics and Policy. Report on a

study undertaken for the Farm & Animal Health Economics Division of Defra.

Harizanova. T., 2008. PhD thesis: Return and risk of investments of

animal husbandry, 50-105.

Rusev, N.,1984. Thesis: Technologies in dairy cattle breeding, pp. 55-75.

http://www.agriculture.de/acms1/conf6/ws5a.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/farm/index_en.htm

http://www.porkinfo.osu.edu/documents/ToddSee3-14-07.pdf

Downloads

Published

2023-10-03