DAILY TIME BUDGET OF DAIRY COWS HOUSED IN TIE STALL BARNS, DURING TOTAL CONFINEMENT

Authors

  • D. GAVOJDIAN Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, Timişoara, Romani
  • L. T. CZISZTER Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, Timişoara, Romania
  • S. ACATINCĂI Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, Timişoara, Romania
  • G. STANCIU Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, Timişoara, Romania
  • I. TRIPON Faculty of Animal Sciences and Biotechnologies, Timişoara, Romania
  • MARIANA FEILER S.C. JOSEMILK S.R.L. Gătaia, Timis county, Romania

Keywords:

dairy cows, tie stall barns, cattle behavior, time budget

Abstract

Although individual and social behavior of cattle has been studied
extensively under pasture and loose housing conditions, similar behavioral
data for partial or total confinement housing are limited. Essentially, the 24-
h time budget represents the net response of a cow to her environment
(Grant, 2003). Daily time budget was first introduced by Grant and Albright
(in 2000) for cows housed in free-stall environment. Choices in stabling and
management affect the behavior, health, longevity and performance of cows.
Behavior while resting, eating, ruminating, urinating or defecating provides
additional information about comfort. In the current study were used ten
Romanian Black and White multiparous cows, housed in a tie stall barn 24
hours per day. Experiments were carried out during the cold season, in
February 2008. Cows monitored were in their first hundred days of
lactation. In our study cows spent resting on average 379.9 minutes (6.33
hours), value that represents 26.38 % from the days interval. Time devoted
to feeding was on average 341.9 minutes (5.69 hours), in 17.5 periods.
Rumination had place on average in 17.3 periods and a total time of 517.5
minutes (8.62 hours). Cows adopted lying position on average 581.2
minutes (40.36% from 24-h) and standing position on average in 858.7
minutes (59.63% from 24-h).

References

Aland A., 2003, Diurnal distribution of dairy cow defecation and

urination, Appl. Anim. Sci., 78, 43

Cooper M.D. et all, 2007, Two or four hour lying deprivation on the

behavior of lactating dairy cows, J. Dairy Sci., 90, 1149-1158

Fisher L. et all, 2002, The effects of feed restriction and lying

deprivation on pituitary-adrenalin axis regulation in lactating cows, Livest. Prod.

Sci., 73, 255-263

Grant R.J., Albright J.L., 1995, Feeding behavior and management

factors during the transition period in dairy cattle, J. Anim. Sci., 73, 2791-2803

Grant R.J., 2003, Taking advantage of dairy cow behaviour: cost of

ignoring time budgets, Cornell Nutr. Conf. Feed Manufac., University Syracuse,

NY,

Haley D.B. et all, 2000, Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity

and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing, J. Anim. Sci., 80,

–263

Hedlund L., Rolls J., 1977, Behaviour of Lactating Dairy Cows during

Total Confidment, J. Dairy Sci., 60, 1807-1812

Hopster H. et all, 1995, Acute effects of cow-calf separation on heart

rate, plasma cortisol and behavior in multiparous dairy herds, Appl. Anim. Behav.

Sci., 44, 1-8

ODriscol K. et all, 2007, A brief note on the validation of a system for

recording lying behaviour in dairy cows, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, 111, 195-200

Stanciu G., 1999, Tehnologia creşterii bovinelor, Ed. Brumar,

Timişoara.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-03

Issue

Section

Technologies Applied in Animal Husbandry