Study on Romanian Consumers’ Opinion Regarding the Animal Welfare Labelling of Animal Products

Authors

  • Ludovic Toma Cziszter Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies Timişoara – 300645-Timişoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Mariya Peneva University of National and World Economy – 1700, Sofia, Studenski Grad “Hristo Botev” Bulgaria
  • Endre Szücs Szent István University – 2103, Gödöllő, Páter Károly u. 1, Hungary
  • Zehra Bozkurt Afyon Kocatepe University – 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Ahmet Necdet Sezer Campus, Turkey
  • Stelian Acatincăi Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies Timişoara – 300645-Timişoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Evangelia N. Sossidou N.AG.RE.F. Veterinary Research Institute – 57001, Thessaloniki, N.AG.RE.F Campus Thermi, Greece
  • Dinu Gavojdian Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies Timişoara – 300645-Timişoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Mishev Plamen University of National and World Economy – 1700, Sofia, Studenski Grad “Hristo Botev” Bulgaria

Keywords:

animal products, animal welfare, labels, Romanian consumers

Abstract

The aim of the paper was to investigate the influence some factors on the consumers’ opinion regarding the animal welfare labelling of animal products. The analysed question was: “When purchasing eggs, meat or milk can you easily identify from the label those products sourced from animal welfare friendly production systems?” Respondents chosen only one answer out of the five offered: yes, most of the time; yes, some of the time; no, very rarely; no, never; and don’t know. Thirty three percent of females considered they could find sometime information regarding the animal welfare on the labels, while males considered that this information could be found very rarely. Up to 55 years of age, 50% of the consumers consider that the labels do not contain the information about animal welfare, while after this age most of consumers consider they found this information on the labels. Over 50% of Orthodox and Roman Catholic responders considered that the information on animal welfare on the labels was found some of the time or very rarely. Respondents, irrespective of their living area or monthly income, considered that there is scarce information regarding animal welfare on the labels. Internet access significantly influenced the consumers regarding the availability of the information on the labels.

References

Croney, C.C., Millman, S.T., The ethical and behavioral bass for farm animal legislation, Journal of Animal Science, 2007, 85, 556-565.

Martelli. G., Consumers’ perception of farm animal welfare: Italian and European perspective, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2009, 8, 31-41.

Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., Tuyttens, F.A.M., Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently?, Livestock Science, 2008, 116, 126-136.

Broglio, R.S., Animal welfare in science and society. In: Food Safety assurance and veterinary public health, Vol. 5, Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks, F.J.M. Smulders and Bo Algers, Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2009, pp. 45-59.

FAWC Report On Welfare Labelling, 2006, Home page address http://www.fawc.org.uk/reports.htm

European Commission – Eurobarometer, Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals, 2005,http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/euro_barometer25_en.pdf

Cziszter, L.T., Bozkurt, Z., Sossidou, E.N., Szücs, E., Peneva, M., Venglovsky, J., Konrád, Sz., Gaál, K., Acatincăi, S, Survey on Romanian consumers’ willingness-to pay for animal products obtained in animal welfare conditions, Lucrări ştiinţifice USAMV Bucureşti, 2009, D, LII, Zootehnie, 246-251.

Sossidou, E.N., Szűcs, E., Personal initiatives to improve animal welfare and food safety, In: Basics of animal welfare and product quality, E. Szűcs, Sz. Konrád, and E. N. Sossidou, Gödöllő, 2009, pp. 23-40.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-03

Issue

Section

Technologies Applied in Animal Husbandry