Determination of the Macro Elements Content of Some Medicinal Herbs

Authors

  • Ducu Sandu Ștef Banat's University Of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, 119,Timişoara - România
  • Iosif Gergen Banat's University Of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, 119,Timişoara - România
  • Lavinia Ștef Banat's University Of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, 119,Timişoara - România
  • Monica Hărmănescu Banat's University Of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, 119,Timişoara - România
  • Cecilia Pop University Of Agricultural Science, Iasi- România
  • Mărioara Drugă Banat's University Of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, 119,Timişoara - România
  • Gabriel Bujancă Banat's University Of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, 119,Timişoara - România
  • Mirela Popa Banat's University Of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, 119,Timişoara - România

Keywords:

calcium, macroelements, magnesium, medicinal plants, potassium, sodium

Abstract

The metals contents of plants are variable, due to the factors like differences between the plants species, geographical area, conditions of drying process. Metals contents in soil are a great importance for their effect of animals and humans, through the biologic chain: soil – plant – feed and food.  Analysis of metals content was made with ContrAA-300, Analytik-Jena device, by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FASS) in air/acetylene flame. It were analyzed the macro elements content for 33 medicinal plants. The main macro elements (Ca, Mg K and Na) were quantified for each sample. The contents in macroelements for analysed samples were in range: 3.763 % (Plantago major) – 0.442 % (Hippophae rhamnoides), for Ca; 0.718% (Urtica dioica) – 0.107% (Hippophae rhamnoides and Pinus), for Mg; 1.417% (Chelidonium majus) – 0.319% (Rhamnus frangula), for K and 1.945% (Cynara scolymus) – 0.021% (Pinus), for Na.

References

Stroev, E.A. Biochemistry, 1989. Mir Publishers Moscow, 29

Cheng, S., Wilmann, M., Chen, H., Sheen, J. Plant Phisiology, 2002, 129, 469-485

Romeis, T., Ludwig, A., Martin, R., Jones, J. D.: EMBO J., 2001, 20, 5556-5567

Albrecht, V., Ritz, O., Linder, S., Harter, K., Kudla, J. EMBO J., 2001, 20, 1051-1063

Sapek A. Phosphorus in in human food chain in Poland. In: The cycle of elements in the nature (in Polish), B. Gworek, J. Misiak. Monografia t. II. Institute of Environment Protection, Warsaw, 2003, 53-61

Mogos V.T., Alimentatia in bolile de nutritie si metabolism, vol. 1, Editura Didactica si Pedagogica, R.A., Bucuresti, 1997, p. 356, 391, 409, 422.

Gergen I., Gogoaşă I., Drăgan Simona, Moigrădean Diana, Hărmănescu Monica, Heavy metal status in fruits and vegetables from a non-poluted area of Romania (Banat County), Metal Elements in Environment, Medicine and Biology, Gârban Z., Drăgan P. (Eds. Symp. Series), Tome VII, Publishing House Eurobit, Timişoara, 2006, p. 149-165.

*** WHO, Report on meetings of expert committees and study groups. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. World Heath Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001, EB109/33.

*** Excerpt from Romanian Ministry of Public Health Ordinance no 975/1998. Maximum limits accepted for heavy metal in foods.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-03