Influence of Additional Level of Probiotics on Intestinal Microbiota in Broiler Chickens

Authors

  • Lavinia Ștef Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Calin Julean Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Ada Cean Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Eliza Simiz Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Ducu Sandu Ștef Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Adela Marcu Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Ioan Peț Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Nicolae Păcală Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania
  • Nicolae Corcionivoschi Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, Romania

Keywords:

broiler chickens, intestinal microbiota, probiotics, pyrosequencing, dominant genders

Abstract

The digestive tract of broiler chickens contains a highly complex microbiota, generally consisting of body beneficial bacteria and, in some cases, of pathogen bacteria. To reduce the quantity of pathogen bacteria, the structure of this microbiota can be changed by using some feed additives, such as probiotics. The purpose of the experiment was to establish the influence of the additional level of probiotics on the intestinal microbiota in broiler chickens. Probiotics administration (Lactobacillus paracasei J.R., Lactobacillus rhamnosus 15b, Lactobacillus lactis y and Lactobacillus lactis FO was made in different combination and at different age of broilers, respectively hatching until 42 days and only in the last week growth. In addition to probiotics, two of the experimental groups used two synthetic aminoacids, namely L threonine and DL methionine, used in excess of the broiler chicken requirements. At the end of the experiment (42 days), caecal content samples were taken. After isolating the caecum, the caecal content was sampled in sterile cryotubes and frozen to -80°C pending DNA extraction. The resulting DNA was subsequently used to detect the differences between the groups with and without probiotics by examining the microbiota composition. At the beginning, the phylogenetic differences were analyzed to establish dominant genders. The investigations performed showed that the use of probiotic microorganisms in various combinations entails changes in the intestinal microbiota. The pyrosequencing method was used to quantify the abundance of microorganisms with probiotic potential in the microbiota composition. Also, the number of microorganisms with probiotic potential changes after the use of probiotic microorganisms.

References

Torok, V.A., Ophel-Keller, K., Loo, M., Hughes, R.J., Application of methods for identifying broiler chicken gut bacterial species linked with increased energy metabolism. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74: 783-791.

Torok, V.A., Allison, G.E., Percy, N.J., Ophel-Keller, K., Hughes, R.J., Influence of antimicrobial feed additives on broiler commensal posthatch gut microbiota development and performance. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77: 3380-3390.

Torok VA, Hughes RJ, Mikkelsen LL, Perez-Maldonado R, Balding K., MacAlpine R, Percy NJ, Ophel-Keller K, Identification and characterization of potential performance-related gut microbiotas in broiler chickens across various feeding trials. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011, 77: 5868-5878

Kelly, D., and T. P. King., Luminal bacteria: Regulation of gut function and immunity. Pages 113–131 in Gut Environment of Pigs. A. Piva, K. E. Bach Knudsen, and J. E. Lindberg, ed. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK,. 2001.

Kohl, K. D., Diversity and function of the avian gut microbiota. J. Comp. Physiol. B Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol., 2012, 182:591–602.

Fuller M. F., The Encyclopedia of Farm Animal Nutrition, CAB International, ISBN 0-85199-369-9, 2004

Stef, L., Nutreturile combinate în alimentatia suinelor si a păsărilor, Ed Mirton, Timisoara, 2008

Yeoman, C.J., Chia,N., Jeraldo, P., Sipos,M., Goldenfeld, N.D., White,B.A., The microbiome of the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Anim.HealthRes. Rev., 2012, 13,89–99.doi:10.1017/S1466252312000138

Pan, D., Yu, Z. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes, 2014, 5,108–119.doi:10.4161/gmic. 26945

Drinceanu D., Biotehnologii în alimentația animalelor, Editura Eurobit, Timisoara, 2000

Alun, C., Martin, A., Roberto, M., La Ragione, Martin J.Woodward, Colonisation of poultry by Salmonella Enteritidis S1400 is Reduced by combined administration of Lactobacillus salivarius 59 and Enterococcus faecium PXN-33, Veterinary Microbiology, 2017, 199, 100-107.

Li, Y; Xu, Q; Huang, Z; Lv, L ; Liu, X,; Yin, C ; Yan, H; Yuan, J Effect of Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 1.1086 on the growth performance and intestinal microbiota of broilers , Journal of applied microbiology, 2016, Volume: 120 , Issue: 1, Pages: 195-204 , DOI: 10.1111/jam.12972.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-12